Wow.
I read through some of the recent pages since I last posted, and it just keeps looking worse. I mean those emails just scream AXACT. It's repulsive. "Examns"? C'mon. And reading the emails, it doesn't look like they understand at all. Just offering a "Classical Methodology" version doesn't fix the problem, because as long as people can just take a 50 question exam and get a whole Masters, the program's credibility is ruined.
Folks, there is no bigger proponent of alternative educational paths, low-cost paths, etc. than me, and what ENEB was doing up to this point was a great move. But this is absurd. A 50 question degree is diploma mill behavior, plain and simple. If they really want to ditch essays, then they should make a full program based entirely on exams that cover each course within each degree program. It really isn't hard to do at all. That would be respectable. This 50 question business is going to sink their credibility for good, and rightfully so.
I read through some of the recent pages since I last posted, and it just keeps looking worse. I mean those emails just scream AXACT. It's repulsive. "Examns"? C'mon. And reading the emails, it doesn't look like they understand at all. Just offering a "Classical Methodology" version doesn't fix the problem, because as long as people can just take a 50 question exam and get a whole Masters, the program's credibility is ruined.
Folks, there is no bigger proponent of alternative educational paths, low-cost paths, etc. than me, and what ENEB was doing up to this point was a great move. But this is absurd. A 50 question degree is diploma mill behavior, plain and simple. If they really want to ditch essays, then they should make a full program based entirely on exams that cover each course within each degree program. It really isn't hard to do at all. That would be respectable. This 50 question business is going to sink their credibility for good, and rightfully so.


![[-]](https://legacy.degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)