ENEB Master Thread

[eLearner]

With the first evaluation, I'm thinking that the evaluator may have looked at everything as an Isabel I document and evaluated everything coming from Isabel I since that is the accredited partner in the school relationship.  This evaluation had more information about the school Isabel I as an accredited institution. 

On the second go around,  that same evaluator probably decided to acknowledge both schools because Isabel I is the accreditor but if you notice there was no discussion about ENEB as an accredited institution because ENEB is not independently accredited but is being viewed as a school housed in an accredited institution. The foreign grades were even included in the translation to the US grades. The second one is better than the first one as a more accurate display.

That thinking is logical and fair. In the same way that we're learning, the evaluators are learning over time as well which can only be a good thing as more opportunities open up.

---

I also sent my results / diploma from ENEB with a statement from ENEB about Isabel, because, as of right now, Isabel's Rector's version will take around 4-5 months to process a request. So, ENEB did the transcript and diploma confirmation for me. 

I prefer the version I got, because it recognizes ENEB.

What's in the written evaluation speaks to an earlier concern brought up in another thread about ENEB not being mentioned. Well, now it has been mentioned and the result is the same. I think it's fantastic.