ENEB Master Thread

[cacoleman1983]

Call me cynical! I find it intriguing that we have this misleading headline from a senior moderator” Foreign Academic Evaluator Says ENEB  MBA = USA RA Accredited MBA” ENEB should be replaced with Ui1 because there nowhere in the unofficial valuation is ENEB mentioned only Ui1.  So we dismissed a known entity as WES and then esteem an unknown entity Validential. I will definitely go with Validential because it seems to have a lower standard but that is not the point.

In your case, it's good to have both because you can show that one, ENEB, was evaluated by itself from WES as a non-accredited Masters but another evaluator "Validential" gave you the RA Masters evaluation based on the Ui1 Master Propio diploma.   An entity that requires WES could look at both evaluations and see that you completed Masters coursework that granted degrees through two legitimate schools.