ENEB Master Thread

[jsd]

Not sure I follow this logic, but I've been away from this for so long that maybe I'm not up to speed, so correct me if i'm wrong.

In the case of EdX/GT, the lecture videos used to be hosted on the EdX platform, but all work and interaction was completed on GT's platform, with GT professors, following GT curriculum. EdX is not creating content nor issuing any degrees or credentials. With ENEB, everything is done through ENEB directly with no interaction with Isabel I faculty or course content. Isabel I is just vouching for the degree that ENEB grants, no?

Or is Isabel I granting their own degree and transcripts on top ENEB? If so, the Isabel I transcripts are probably much more likely to get a more favorable review by the foreign degree evaluators, why are we even bothering having ENEB evaluated? Just keep it under Isabel I, and list it as Isabel I on a resume as stated above.

But if Isabel I is only acting as a partner that is endorsing the ENEB degree, it seems misleading to say Isabel I is the university. And with all the insistence that ENEB is legit, it seems odd to try to conceal the source.

But if Isabel I is actually granting their own degree/transcripts for this program, I am a lot more interested and will have to start reading through all this again